HOTB2020 Panel 7.2: Nonhuman Encounters, Entanglements, and Agencies I
HUMANITIES ON THE BRINK: ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT, EMERGENCY
AN ASLE-SPONSORED NEARLY CARBON-NEUTRAL CONFERENCE
Panel 7.2: Nonhuman Encounters, Entanglements, and Agencies I
[easy-share buttons=”facebook,twitter,linkedin,mail” counters=0 native=”no” image=https://live-ehc-english-ucsb-edu-v01.pantheonsite.io/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/yusuke-asai-waf-1.jpg url=https://live-ehc-english-ucsb-edu-v01.pantheonsite.io/?p=12640 facebook_text=Share twitter_text=Tweet linkedin_text=Link text=”Nonhuman Encounters, Entanglements, and Agencies at #ASLE2020″]
“‘Chemical Castration’: White Genocide and Male Extinction in Rhetoric of Endocrine Disruption”
Meg Perret (Harvard University)
“Biophony in the Anthropocene: Changes to the Avian Soundscape Since Thoreau’s Time at Walden Pond”
Rebecca A. Durham (University of Montana)
“Bird Count””
Rebecca A. Durham (University of Montana)
“Saltwater Wetlands”
Brian Glaser (Chapman University)
Q & A
If you would like to comment in the Q&A, register here.
Note that questions and comments can be intended for individual speakers, the entire panel, or anyone who has posted to the Q&A. Respond directly to a particular question/comment by way of the little “reply” below it. The vertical threadlike lines are there to make it easier to see which part of the discussion (i.e. “thread”) you are taking up.
Hi Meg—Is your video clipped? It stops at 8:30ish minutes, and I’m interested to hear more about your analysis of white supremacist takes on androgen disruption.
The audio cuts out for about a minute but then resumes for me. Just skip ahead to about 9:50ish.
“my sister, the estuary at dawn.” This is so beautiful, Brian! Thank you!
The argument about the decline of the human species due to no more cismen is silly; pretty sure that we could just clone ourselves, at this point. By “human species” they very clearly are dogwhistling “white men”.
Meg, this is a very good analysis of the rhetoric of male decline. I can see Alex Jones’ very compelling frogsuit video tying in to the alt-right usage of the Pepe frog meme. I wonder if perhaps that is also why Jordan Peterson’s bizarro lobster logic caught on so well in those circles; because the altright are already used to synonymizing male decline with the biological reproductive habits of amphibians, it was not such a leap to consider the gendered social habits of crustaceans as a pattern for what “natural” human relations should be? What do you think?
(I tried italicizing “very compelling” to signal my sarcasm but the comment box doesn’t play well with HTML tags, it seems. Just know that Alex Jones is not, to my mind, a compelling thinker in the least.)